In pursuit of the statutory goals of the Sedlak’s Foundation, in raising human bioelectronic awareness in the following aspects: material, mental and spiritual, the PSYCHE tab is a collection of concepts – issues – attitudes – examples, the assimilation of which will allow to get acquainted with an intellectual space of diversity of the outside world defined by the multiple, infinite narrative of the human ego, while at the same time expanding their substantive competences in terms of understanding certain psychological rhetorics figures.

A characteristic trait of this space is a reasoning, which has set out to describe the Highest Being, and even answer the question: Where do we come from?

Gomperz, who’s lately published an engaging analysis of the Plato’s letter (I’ll describe a more important fragment of the letter below), also comes to the conclusion that this document, written by the 75 year old philosopher, gives the key to his whole life and work. Gomperz’s interpretation, overlapping with mine, is that the central Plato’s doctrine around which his thinking revolves since the first travel onto Sycyli and which has inspired his elderly texts such as Parmenides, Taejtet, Filet and Laws, was pythagoreanism of the initiated, based on the numbers metaphysics.

In the beginning of the first part of this book, I found that Plato (putting aside the compliers, counterfeiters, copyists and explorers of the Pythagorean treasury), the only genius, who passed us a direct and powerful reflection of this doctrine, can be regarded as an initiate not bound by oath, as a honoris causa Pythagorean, someone like „member-corresponder” of the School.

However, keeping in mind a great deal of rebuses scattered throughout his works (some of which have been interpreted only recently), and especially rereading a certain fragment from the great VII letter (which, I can confirm, is one of the most important documents in the history of human thought – a confession, an autobiography, a testament of the „Daemon” or the half-god, if anyone like him ever existed), in the end, one would like to judge, that Plato has not only swore an oath of secrecy, but also followed it scrupulously, shedding only a few sparks from the great light – just enough to pave the way for those, who prove themselves worthy to carry the torch further.

Here’s the fragment:

„About everyone, who has written and will be writing about anything from this field and say that, because of what they’ve heard from me, or others, or having figured it on their own, are familiar with what is the subject of my most serious considerations, this much I have to say, that it it not, in my opinion, possible for them to understand it at all. Nor is there any dissertation of mine discussing these issues and certainly there will not be any. For they are not things that could be put into words, just like knowledge from other science’s fields, but from the long-term communing with the subject by virtue of being familiar with it, as if under the influence of a passing spark, a light is ignited in the soul and burns from now on, fueling itself”

Right after comes the following paragraph:

“He who has once grasped this doctrine is in no danger of ever forgetting it. It is, after all, a handful of very concise formulas… Among living people, only a few know them.”

„The Golden Number”, Matila C. Ghyka, Cracow 2001, p. 219-220

Bibliographty:

1. Matila C. Ghyka, „The Golden Numer”, Universitas, Cracow 2001;
2. Plato, „The Symposium”, Książnica Polska, Warsaw 1924;
3. Luiza Rzymowska, „Istota gnostycyzmu w świetle interpretacji pojęcia prawdy”, (“The essence of Gnosticism in the light of the interpretation of the concept of truth”), University of Wrocław publishing house, Wrocław 2002;
4. Rudolf Steiner, “The issue of upbringing as a social issue”, Genesis publishing house, Gdynia 2004;
5. Umberto Eco, “Libraries”, Milan 10 of march 1981, Wrocław 1990;
6. Albertyna Szczudłowska-Dembska, Bożena Charkiewicz, Edyta Kopp, Wincenty Myszor, Agata Sowińska, Wojciech Stawiszyński “Tajemnice gnozy”, (“The mysteries of gnosis”), Sub Lupa publishing house, Warsaw 2016;
7. Erich von Däniken, selected works;
8. Fritjof Capra, “The Tao of Physics”, Rebis, Warsaw 1994;
9. Wojciech Stamm, “Zmierzch”, (“Dusk”); Unpublished theater play, including translations of Jakub Böme’s writings;
10. Andrzej Szelmanowski, “Nauka-Etyka-Wiara 2011” – “O godności uczonego chrześcijańskiego–wspomnienie sylwetki Prof. Włodzimierza Sedlaka w 100. rocznicę jego urodzin”, (“Science-Ethics-Faith 2011” – “About the dignity of a Christian scholar-reminding the silhouette of Prof. Włodzimierz Sedlak in his 100th birthday anniversary”), Warsaw 2011;
11. Andrzej Szelmanowski, “Nauka-Etyka-Wiara 2009” – “Istota i rola informacji w bioelektronicznej teorii świadomości Prof. Włodzimierza Sedlaka”, (“Science-Ethics-Faith 2009” – “The essence and role of information in the bioelectronic theory of consciousness by Włodzimierz Sedlak”), Warsaw 2009;
12. Janusz Sławiński, “Cień Boga–światło. Elektromagnetyzm, a niektóre problemy ontologiczne i eschatologiczne”, („Light – the shadow of God. Electromagnetism and certain ontological and eschatological problems”), UAM. Faculty of Theology. Editorial Office, Poznań 2007;
13. Fritz Albert Popp, “Biology of Light”, Common Knowledge, Warsaw 1992;
14. Włodzimierz Sedlak, “Postępy fizyki życia”, („Advances in the Physics of Life”), PAX, Warsaw 1984;
15. Institute of mother and child, obstetrics and gynecology clinic, “Ciąża i środowisko”, (“Pregnancy and environment”), Red. M. Troszyński, B. Chazan, Warsaw 1985;
16. Academy of Physical Education in Warsaw, “Wychowanie fizyczne i sport”, (“Physical education and sport”), quarterly, volume XVII No. 2, Warsaw 1973;
17. Academy of Catholic Theology, “Z zagadnień filozofii przyrodoznawstwa i filozofii przyrody, tom dziewiąty”, (“From the problems of the philosophy of natural science and the philosophy of nature, volume nine”) Warsaw 1987;